[Search] Search   [Recent Topics] Recent Topics   [Members]  Member Listing   [Groups] Back to home page 
Messages posted by: Sesquideus
Profile for Sesquideus -> Messages posted by Sesquideus [32] Go to Page: 1, 2, 3 Next 
Author Message
A very nice puzzle, but seemed very easy to me, easier than most 4*. I usually take a couple of hours for 4*, this took me some 15 minutes.
Number: Puzzle #6659
Genre: Cargoships
Author: jama
Appeared at: May 27, 2021

Wow. This is my personal record, maybe three seconds and six clicks
Great one!
The fourth square in the second row does not accept letter "D".
Number: Puzzle #6609
Genre: Domino
Author: anurag.sahay
Appeared at: February 26, 2021

The correct solution is not accepted now, two borders are missing.

alter wrote:
I always get early a contradiction. Could there be a mistake in the given numbers? 

No, it is alright, though I also made a mistake on my first try.
Ah, this is perfect. This might be the best one I have ever seen

Not too easy, but not frustrating, only too interesting to let me go to bed already. Thank you.
Number: Puzzle #2261
Genre: Sum Thing
Author: Eranus
Appeared at: August 19, 2011

A very nice puzzle... not too easy, not too difficult, and beautiful all the way through.
Number: Puzzle #6550
Genre: Skyscrapers
Author: jama
Appeared at: January 3, 2021

The two central fields of the first row do not accept the digit 4 for some reason.

HappyDog wrote:
(I think you meant puzzle #436.) 

Of course, my bad.

I guess a "clean" solution would be to introduce diagonal clues, as in kakuro. But I do not know how difficult it would be to implement, and half empty they do not look very nice.
I am afraid the solution is not consistent with the rules and with puzzle #2205.

Here 1 means "one crossing in the nearest contiguous section of the row" whereas in #2205 it means "one crossing in the entire row".
I think the solution is not consistent with puzzle #435 in its interpretation of the rules (number of crossings in the row vs in the nearest section of the row).
A very nice puzzle. I liked that I was unable to establish the correct direction until the very end.
I don't think so, in fact it can be solved in a completely straightforward way. The beginning was a bit difficult to spot, but I did not need any backtracking after that.
Maybe I missed something, but this one seemed extremely difficult to me, even though I had solved all other ABCs. I would rate it *****.
Profile for Sesquideus -> Messages posted by Sesquideus [32] Go to Page: 1, 2, 3 Next 
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.6 © JForum Team